At Stanford Law’s annual Constitution Day, scholars explored how competing theories of interpretation shape the Constitution’s role in modern democracy.
In a JAMA+ AI Conversations podcast, Professor Michelle Mello discusses her proposal for an ethical framework for disclosing AI use in healthcare, one that would highlight both legal considerations and practical challenges.
Professor Nora Freeman Engstrom, Owen Foulkes, JD ’26, and former Rhode Center Civil Justice Fellow Brianne Holland-Stergar share the findings of a new report on multidistrict litigation.
In a recent paper, Professors Robert Bartlett and Colleen Honigsberg examine new SEC rules that link corporate disclosure to public trading in the over-the-counter market.
In Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, the Supreme Court lifted an injunction that had ordered ICE not to conduct some kinds of immigration raids in Los Angeles. In this discussion, Professor Orin Kerr and Academic Fellow Duncan Hosie explain what the Court did (or did not do) in the Noem case; what it means for immigration enforcement; and what it means for the power of federal courts to intervene to limit Trump Administration policies.
Stanford Continuing Studies presents the second annual Reimagining Democracy, a free six-part speaker series produced with the Office of Community Engagement and the Stanford Democracy Hub. Hosted by Dean Debra Satz and Professor Larry Diamond, the series brings together leading Stanford scholars to help us understand the moment: from the questions we’re asking ourselves about democratic decline to the ideas we have for democratic resilience and restoration. Session 2: Constitutional Crisis? on October 14, 2025 will feature Stanford Law ProfessorsBernadette Meyler, Jud Campbell, and Fred O. Smith, Jr.
